A few days after print publication, Knight's syndicated newspaper column, which moves twice a week, will be posted. The most recent will appear at the top.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

The game is rigged in ‘gray economy’

Bill Knight column for Thurs., Fri., or Sat., Sept. 4, 5 or 6

Workers who used to be on the edges of the economy – day laborers and temps, freelancers and adjuncts, independent contractors and contingent employees – are now closer to the core.

Powerful, for-profit corporations in general and near-monopolies in particular benefit from wage stagnation and deteriorating job benefits that have left U.S. workers “confused, angry, frustrated and scared,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka recently told the Steelworkers convention.

It’s a “gray economy,” writes Lynn Stuart Parramore for AlterNet.

“The gray economy is trapping millions of Americans in a dark world of haphazard and insecure jobs, few or no benefits, nonexistent chances for advancement, and little recourse if they get screwed,” she says. “[Several] factors … have shifted power away from workers and toward employers who seek their short-term advantage no matter what the social and economic costs.”

The shift to job insecurity has been propelled by a bad blend of business globalization, outsourcing, corporations’ focus on short-term profits, Wall Street’s financial shenanigans, and the erosion of labor law. Also, author Barry Lynn in his book “Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction” explains how the top-down economic trend isn’t as obvious as in the past, when a company like Standard Oil or Bell [Telephone] operated. Today, companies that seem to be competitors can all be controlled or owned by the same conglomerate – like Lenscrafters, Pearle Vision, Sears Optical and Sunglass Hut, which are all part of the Italian company Luxottica.

“Monopoly doesn’t mean that a company controls 100 percent of the marketplace,” Lynn says. It’s “that a company has sufficient control of the market to shape the outcomes of that market to its own advantage – to shape pricing, [even] reduce our liberties.

“As workers, one of the things you prize is an open market where you can sell your work to many potential buyers, many potential employers,” he continued. “If there’s a lot of consolidation nationally in your industry, or even your town, you may find yourself with really only one or two buyers for your work. That means that you have less ability to negotiate higher wages. It also means that you have less real freedom: you can’t just pick up and leave if you get a bad boss.”

Economic inequality is connected, too, he said.

“Back in the origins of anti-monopoly law in America, the people who wrote those laws … aimed at inequality because they saw monopolists as using their power to grab all of the opportunity and all of the wealth in a particular human activity and not leave anything over for other people,” Lynn said. “A generation ago, tens of thousands of families in America were in the business of selling groceries. Now, there are just a few companies that sell groceries in America.”

The gray economy also has correlations that are less obvious.

Social consequences range from the loss of tax revenue that could be used for infrastructure, education and so on, to difficult business climates in which honest employers must compete, to workers’ health. According to a recent University of Michigan study, chronic job insecurity was a stronger predictor of poor health than either smoking or hypertension, potentially shaving years off people’s lives.

A responsive, responsible government could be part of a solution, Lynn said.

“The reason we founded government is to break up dangerous concentrations of power at home and abroad,” he said. “You might not want to use government to fix all your ills – you might not want to use government to fix even most of your ills. But you need to have government to keep yourself free. To keep markets open. If you don’t have government, then every single system will be taken over by a private monopolist – which really means private government.”

People “have two choices,” he continued. “They can either sit back and do nothing and allow [a] company to manipulate [a] marketplace, or they organize and they can fight.”

Low-wage workers fighting for better wages and working conditions and the right to organize is inspiring, Trumka said.

“From fast food to forged steel, and everywhere in between, more and more people talk about economic inequality, people who never spoke the words before,” Trumka said. “The public is debating big issues, like a living wage and collective bargaining.”

“A lot of people didn’t understand the connections between their neighbors and themselves,” he continued. “They didn’t have to, because generations of strong union contracts kept us in pretty good shape. But that’s not the case anymore. People everywhere are starting to understand themselves as workers.”

[PICTURED: Cartoon by Matt Wuerker via]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.